Friday, August 28, 2009

Cash for Clunkers Program: An Aftermath

The auto industry is one of the industries that has been hardly hit by the economic downfall. Some auto companies had closed down or undergone mass lay off just to avoid further losses.

To help revive the car industry, the government implemented a program called Cash for Clunkers.

Cash for Clunkers is a program whereby people are encouraged to buy new and more energy efficient cars in lieu of the incentives, rebates and other benefits given to them. This is done to boost car sales which would eventually help the automotive industry.

In Washington, the program generated about 700,000 new car sales giving the U.S. auto industry the needed push. The government collected a data stating that dealers submitted 690,114 sales totaling to $2.88 billion.

Others say, however, that the growth in sales may be short-lived. Some predicted that consumers may be regretting their clunkers purchases, especially since many buyers traded in paid-off vehicles in return for new cars financed through loans.

In a survey conducted by an automotive research firm CNW Research, out of 1000 Cash for Clunkers participants, 17 percent had doubts about their vehicle purchase after taking on monthly car payments of $275 to $350 per month.

On the other hand, the Obama Administration believed that the program was a major success by providing needed stimulus to the auto industry thus helping the economy.

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said that due to the program manufacturing plants have added shifts and recalled workers. In fact, Moribund showrooms were brought back to life. Moreover, consumers did not only contribute to the economy but to the environment as well by buying fuel-efficient cars.

Cash for Clunkers has its advantages and disadvantages. As to what effects are predominant could be discovered in time. As for now, one thing is clear. The auto industry is slowly recuperating.

If you have questions about the program and how it is going to affect your monetary status, engage the services of a business attorney who can enlighten you of the risks involved.

Monday, August 17, 2009

Man convicted for Hit and Run

A simple traffic infraction of beating a red light could cause devastating outcome. While, beating a red light coupled with fleeing from the scene of the accident is a perfect concoction for a huge legal consequences ahead.

Initially, hit and run accidents may give the fleeing driver a temporary freedom and a certain degree of satisfaction that he was able to evade the authorities. But the act of fleeing will only contribute to the gravity of the previous infraction.

Consequently, stiffer penalty such as imprisonment or fine or both would be imposed upon the driver.

In Santa Ana, Kenny Minh Phan of Fountain Valley was convicted of felony hit-and-run causing injury and misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter for leaving the scene of the accident.

The conviction was due to an accident Phan was involved in last January 25, 2008 where his car collided with another vehicle after he ran a red light. The occupant in the other vehicle, Richard Lauvao, was killed instantaneously.

Phan, who was arrested two months after the incident, would be sentenced on September 12, 2009 where a penalty of 13 years imprisonment could be imposed upon him.

Deputy District Attorney Jess Rodriguez said that the impact of the accident was so severe that Lauvao was nearly decapitated in half by his seat belt. He also added that Phan “made a conscious, reckless decision to run the red light”.

Just like what Lauvao’s loved ones did, the victim’s loved ones can file a personal injury case against the negligent driver. A hit and run attorney could help them pursue said case.

Friday, August 14, 2009

Board Fines Industrial Company for Contamination

While making profits is their main goal, companies, as members of the community, are responsible in observing and respecting the laws of man and of the nature as well.

When an industrial company Ametek Inc. contaminated the groundwater plume in El Cajon, the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board imposed a fine of $600,000. The board threatened to double the penalty should Ametek Inc. failed to act upon board’s demands.

The board revealed that Ametek Inc. was responsible for the trichloroethene and other toxins leak at their former plant on Greenfield Drive. It further revealed that it already pushed for mapping and treatment of the chemicals for 20 years but had been delayed due to legal issues, bureaucracy and efforts of Ametek Inc. to comply without penalties.

While the board did not cite any direct health concerns with the plume, a human exposure to it may result to dizziness, organ damage and even death.

The board expected that in few months Ametek Inc. would be able to finish mapping the underground waste flow and propose a remedy. In the end, the company must meet soil and groundwater cleanup levels set by the water board or else the board will impose a stiffer penalty.

With various environmental threats and contaminants, all must exert effort to contribute in making the earth a habitable planet for the coming generations.

In pursuit of this, legal means may be resorted to compel stubborn companies to follow the rules through the help of expert and experienced personal injury lawyers knowledgeable on the matter.

Monday, August 3, 2009

Swing Set Recalled for Lack of Assembly Instructions

A product must not come out in public unless it has been tested as safe to use. Tests for safety should be made especially if it is intended for children.

Moreover, whenever a defect has been found to exist in certain products, the same should be recalled immediately. Recall should be made without waiting for any report of injury.

Recently, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recalled 1,950 Little Tikes Clubhouse Swing Set because it did not include assembly directions for its seat harness.

Consumers were ordered to stop using the recalled swing sets until they have obtained and read the assembly instructions for its harness by accessing the manufacturer’s website.

In this case, the product was not really defective. The defect, if there was, lies on the non-inclusion of its assembly instructions in the set. Recalling the swing set might be a harsh consequence but the product was complicated to begin with that instruction on how to set up must be at hand during the assembly process.

It is a good thing no children were reportedly injured. However, should someone appear to have been injured, a product liability case may be filed against the swing manufacturer. A damage suit may be pursued through the assistance of a personal injury attorney.